RED FLAGS AND QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER, #KARED READ Karen Read
RED FLAG ALERT,
RED FLAGS in case of #KarenRead
____________________________________
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER:
1. How does Karen know "exactly what happened that night", as
she stated? She either dropped him off, and he never made it
inside, or, if she was "not there", she COULD NOT know what,
if, anything, happened at the scene?
2. In the presence of EMT, Karen stated the following to
statements:
"I hit Him!", "I did it." "Did I do it"
-is it possible that neither what the state is arguing, nor what
the defense is saying, are accurate accounts of the evening in
question?
-is it possible, Karen, due to having a high BAC, accidentally,
or, unknowingly, hit him with her car?
-thus far, early in trial, to be fair, the evidence is neither aligned
with the state's contentions of the evening, nor the defenses.
I feel, in my opinion, that evidence supports that Read was
overly-intoxicated, and may have accidentally, or unknowingly
struck John with her car.
3. When Karen Read is asked, for the first time, by reporters if
"she did it", she doesn't ANSWER THE QUESTION DIRECTLY.
She answers the question, with a statement, but not a denial.
She states, "WE know why did it. YOU ALL KNOW."
-anytime someone being accused of a crime, and is asked
directly, did you do this crime, one can expect a strong response
of either denial or confession. There is neither. We would expect a
STRONG AFFIRMATIVE DENIAL. Instead, there is defiance and
avoidance of the question.
4. Karen's lawyer, instead of Karen herself, prompts, or picks up on
prompt, and, he answers the question with a strong denial
on her behalf. He finishes/completes her answer for her.
5. We know, factually, that there was a RING camera on the
porch of said police officer's house. Why did this camera not
show any video evidence of ppl and or a dog, on the ring camera,
with John o Keefe, at any point that night? They were alleged
to have "all" beaten him up, and carried him outside,
without the camera picking up anything. NO EVIDENCE
of the Defense's "defense."
Comments
Post a Comment