"PROFILING THE PROFILER; HOW JOHN DOUGLAS GOT VIOLENT CRIMINALS TO TALK WITH THE F.B.I.
PROFILING THE PROFILER; HOW JOHN DOUGLAS GOT VIOLENT CRIMINALS TO TALK WITH THE F.B.I.
___________________________________________________
John Douglas took on the undertaking of trying to interview
violent criminals behind bars across the country. Initially, upon
coming up with the idea, didn't have any planned goals in mind.
He saw the best way to approach these interviews would simply
to get the subjects to talk. With that beginning baby step, Douglas
began what would continue to be important research for
generations to come. Not to mention, the basic ideas and
principles that he developed are STILL used in modern day
practices of this sort.
Douglas was pleasantly surprised that such offenders were
willing to be interviewed or share any information at all. Douglas
had the expectation that many of the criminals that they desired
to talk to, had been in prison for decades, were never getting out,
and, thus, seemingly, had nothing to lose or gain by agreeing to
be interviewed by Douglas.
The reasons for prisoner's participation varied in its motive:
everything from boredom, remorse, an opportunity to relive
their crimes by discussing them out loud. For some that were
interviewed, they shared it had transformed their lives. Douglas
himself believes that prisoners agreed to talk, often, was their
EGO.
By the time a person is incarcerated, for a violent crime, that
person has already faced a number of interviews: interrogation
by detectives, lawyers, evaluations before sentencing, interviews
with psychiatrists/psychologists in person. Douglas noted a
tendency to not be good historians; they tended to tell the
interviewer what they wanted to hear vs. their true feelings.
Douglas shared that they had to guard themselves against
"fooled" by hardened criminals. He did this by emerging himself
into the case file. It gave Douglas direct access to the answers why
they did what they did/the accuracy of their reporting/truth vs.
lies, in what the prisoner had actually done via their crimes. In
addition to reviewing lengthy case files, Douglas also went over
psychiatric reports, prison evaluations, IQ tests; anything available
on the prisoner. Douglas believed that the best way to get honest
answers, was to have the ability to confront the subjects with
inconsistencies that deviate from known information in their
case file.
The second thing that Douglas did, intentionally, to ensure
that he and others would not be "fooled" by the prisoners, was
the commitment to spend as much time as necessary. in the
interview, to take as long as it would take, to "move past the
small talk." Cutting through what Douglas called the "bullshit",
"the phony sentiment" to wear down the prisoner to get to heart
of the reasons behind the prisoner's violent behaviors.
Douglas detailed that it was one thing to interview, but quite
bit more difficult to be face-to-face-woth the prisoner. Through
practice, Douglas learned that dressing-down made the prisoners
more comfortable right away. The more Douglas and his team
conducte interviews, the better and better he felt they were
becoming at their job. Douglas discovered that the paranoid do
not like eye contact; it only increased their sense of paranoia.
The grandiose kind, liked domination and putting others
'below" them. Some prisoners, he found, just wanted ATTENTION.
Douglas developed a working theory that recognizing the basic
elements must have something in common was his first step.
The next step was to understand how their differences in
personality, criminal sophistication, and MOTIVE lead the person
to, for example, become a mugger.
Everyone that Douglas interviewed had come from
dysfunctional backgrounds. Sometimes themes were overt;
physical and sexual abuse, alcoholic parents, Douglas found that
in these cases there tended to be an absence of a loving or
nurturing atmosphere. Some came from homes where punishment
was inconsistent at best. Douglas set out to understand what,
motivates many of these guys to have to desire of power and
control over their victims. Douglas noticed how offenders
overcompensated for this perceived loss of power and control.
Those subjects who are angry and violent, the majority learn,
across their lifetime and or in therapy and or detention
appropriate coping strategies for anger that do not involve
hurting one's self or others. For those prisoners that were unable
to develop coping mechanisms, act out violently. There are
emotions, such as anger, that can have a focused and healthy
outlet; (ie, competitive sports, and putting feelings into the game).
The prisoners that Douglas was interviewing had not developed
a healthy outlet for their emotions. Typically, this manifested in
prisoners who self-soothed negative emotions, by making others
hurt too, torturing small animals before moving on to adult crimes.
These prisoners were manipulative, dominating, and attempt
to control OVER a victim. This is how they overcome their feelings
of inferiority. For Douglas, this was just the beginning of a
historic program that the FBI continues to implore with
prisoners across the country from a variety of backgrounds,
circumstances, and conditions.
Comments
Post a Comment